...This week’s debate, however, was different because from the off Dawkins moved it onto safer territory– and at the very beginning made a most startling admission. He said:Melanie Phillips :: The Spectator
A serious case could be made for a deistic God.
This was surely remarkable. Here was the arch-apostle of atheism, whose whole case is based on the assertion that believing in a creator of the universe is no different from believing in fairies at the bottom of the garden, saying that a serious case can be made for the idea that the universe was brought into being by some kind of purposeful force. A creator.
This article and the following comments make for interesting reading... and when I say "interesting reading" I mean fantastically joyful reading.
Oh and watch this [http://www.dawkinslennoxdebate.com/] too... when you get a chance. It makes for interesting watching... and when I say "interesting watching" I mean fantastically joyful watching.
I tip my hat to Derick Dickens for the heads-up on this. Cheers mate! Another reason why TWITTER rawks!!!